Noonan v. Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation
Linda Noonan |
Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation |
3:2013cv00354 |
March 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Dennis J. Hubel |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 25 is GRANTED, Plaintiffs are granted 30 days to replead. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (kb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Noonan v. Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Linda Noonan | |
Represented By: | Tara Lawrence |
Represented By: | Aaron W. Baker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.