Noonan v. Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation
Plaintiff: Linda Noonan
Defendant: Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation
Case Number: 3:2013cv00354
Filed: March 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Dennis J. Hubel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 25 is GRANTED, Plaintiffs are granted 30 days to replead. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (kb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noonan v. Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goldstar Estate Buyers Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Noonan
Represented By: Tara Lawrence
Represented By: Aaron W. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?