United States of America v. $166,450.48 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| $166,450.48 in U.S. Currency, $121,000.00 in U.S. Currency and Assorted Precious Metals |
| 3:2013cv00562 |
| April 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Malcolm F. Marsh |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 981 Civil Forfeiture |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER. Based on the foregoing, claimants' motions for summary judgment (#29, #32, #49, & #71) are DENIED. The stay of this proceeding as to all claimants except Knezevich has expired. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall complete discovery within 60 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 08/07/2014 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER. Based on the foregoing, the government's motion to extend stay of proceedings to all claimant's 38 is GRANTED. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(g)(1), the stay previously entered in this case is extended to al l claimants for a period of 120 days. At the conclusion of 120 days, the parties shall submit a joint status report addressing the propriety of continuing the stay. Claimants' motions for summary judgment and for oral argument [29, 31, 32, & 49] are HELD IN ABEYANCE during the pendency of the stay. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 12/16/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
