Vesta Corporation v. Amdocs Management Limited et al
Plaintiff: Vesta Corporation
Defendant: Amdocs Management Limited and Amdocs, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv01142
Filed: July 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Marco A. Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 630 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 574 is GRANTED in part. The Court dismisses Plaintiffs claims for trade secret misappropriation as they relate to its Best Practices Scorecard and compilation trade secret. Signed on 9/12/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
May 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 589 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Redact 546 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiff's Motion to Seal 554 is DENIED. The Court will allow the redaction of specific interest rates. Plaintiff is instructed to file an amended list of proposed redactions that comply with this Opinion and Order within fourteen days of this Order. Signed on 5/4/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (joha)
February 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 553 OPINION & ORDER: The Court GRANTS in part Defendants' Motion to Exclude and Strike Plaintiff's Late Identified Alleged Technical Trade Secrets 483 . Signed on 2/12/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
February 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 548 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Imposition of Sanctions 524 is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff will be allowed additional time for targeted discovery to be determined at a scheduling conference. Plaintiff is directed to file its request for the specific amount of monetary sanctions within 14 days after the entry of judgment. The Court declines to award additional sanctions at this time. Signed on 2/1/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
February 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 389 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Source Code 358 is granted. Defendants are ordered to respond to Plaintiff's RFP 37, consistent with this Opinion & Order, within 30 days of the date below. Signed on 2/21/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (joha)
August 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 268 OPINION & ORDER: Denying Motion for Clarification 257 . Signed on 08/31/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (ag)
June 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 255 OPINION & ORDER: The Court denies Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 236 . See 17-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 6/16/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 221 OPINION & ORDER: The Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 187 . The Court denies Plaintiff's motion to compel a response to Interrogatory 3 and grants Plaintiff's motion to compel a response to Interrogatory 4. See 5-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 4/4/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 141 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motion for a protective order 105 is granted in part. Defendants do not have to respond to any of Plaintiff's discovery relating to the "Confidential Solutions Methods" until Plaintiff has ide ntified, with reasonable particularity, the trade secrets which Plaintiff contends it disclosed to Defendants. Within 21 days of this Order, Plaintiff must amend its responses to Defendants' Interrogatory Nos. 1, 15 and 16, consistent with this Opinion & Order. See 19-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 11/30/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
September 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss 65 Plaintiff's antitrust claims is granted. Defendants' request for judicial notice 67 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion to change or transfer venue 68 is denied. The case schedule proposed by the parties and adopted in this Court's Scheduling Order 62 on May 15, 2015, remains in place. See 43-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 9/3/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss 25 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' request for judicial notice 26 is granted. If Plaintiff chooses to amend the complaint, it must be done within 14 days of the date below. See 24-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vesta Corporation v. Amdocs Management Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amdocs Management Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amdocs, Inc.
Represented By: Kristin J. Achterhof
Represented By: Timothy S. DeJong
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Finn
Represented By: Yonaton M. Rosenzweig
Represented By: Joshua L. Ross
Represented By: Robert A. Shlachter
Represented By: Bruce G. Vanyo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vesta Corporation
Represented By: Stephen F. English
Represented By: Erick J. Haynie
Represented By: Joanna T. Perini-Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?