Pohlman v. Hormann et al
| Marlin Brandt Pohlman |
| J. Baysinger, C. Coleman, C. DiGulio, D. Fuzi, Kevin Hormann, R. Ladeby, C. Olson, Collett Peters and J. Smith |
| 3:2014cv01483 |
| September 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief 89 , 98 & 100 are Denied. Signed on 3/24/16 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
112
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 39 is Denied. Additionally, Plaintiffs First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 40 and Plaintiff's Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 41 are also Denied. Signed on 1/22/16 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff's Motion 76 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court now construes Claim 1 as alleging the liability of Officers Wilber and Harris for Plaintiff's April 25, 2014 injury and ORDE RS plaintiff to show cause why that claim should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to submit documentary evidence showing he properly exhausted his administrati ve remedies regarding his April 25, 2014 Injury. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Reconsideration 79 is mooted by this Order and is therefore DENIED as well. The following motions are STAYED pending resolution of whether Claim 1 must be dismiss ed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies: Plaintiff's Motions to Compel: 38 , 56 , 57 , 63 , 64 ; Plaintiff's Motions to Add Supplemental Parties and Motions for Joinder 52 , 53 ; Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motions ( 39 , 40 , 41 ); Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 88 ; and Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 89 . Additionally, the deadline for Defendants to file an Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 87 is also STAYED. Signed on 9/30/2015 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gw)
|
|
Filing
72
OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 60 is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Summary judgment is entered in favor of defendants Hormann, Peters, Ladeby, Coleman, Baysinger, and Olson as to Pohlman's ADA accommodation and retaliatory transfer claims. Those claims are dismissed with prejudice and those defendants are dismissed from this action. Further, Defendants' motion for summary judgment against all new claims introduced in Pohlman� 39;s Proposed Amended Complaint 37 is Denied in Part as it applies to Claims 5 and 6, arising after September 17, 2014, the date Pohlman filed his initial complaint. Defendants' motion is Granted in Part as it applies to Claims 1, 3, and 4, pr edating September 17, 2014, and Pohlman must strike the portions of his Proposed Amended Complaint 37 related to those claims. Thus, Pohlman is granted leave to re-file his Proposed Amended Complaint 37 in accordance with this Order. Pohlman 9;s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint 37 , as modified by this Order, is Granted. Finally, the stay as to Pohlman's Motions to Compel 38 , 56 , 57 63 & 64 ; and Motions to Add Supplemental Parties and Motions for Joinder 52 & 53 is Lifted. In addition, the stay of discovery and pending deadlines is Lifted. Discovery and motions may proceed on Pohlmans remaining claims. Signed on 8/4/15 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery and for a Stay of Pending Deadlines [59) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [37); Motions to Compel [38), [56), [5 7), [63) & [64); and Motions to Add Su pplemental Parties and Motions for Joinder 52 & 53 are STAYED pending resolution of defendants' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment 60 . In addition, deadlines for defendants' to respond to plaintiff's various summary judgment mot ions 39 , 40 & 41 are STAYED pending resolution of defendants' Motion and plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time 64 to complete discovery is GRANTED to the extent the deadline is STAYED. Plaintiff's Second and Third Motions fo r Appointment of counsel 55 & 64 are DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Court's prior Order 10 . Finally, plaintiff is reminded that his response to defendants' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment is due by June 15, 2015. Signed on 5/22/15 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 15 is DENIED. Signed on 10/20/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
