Hunt v. Sallie Mae, Inc.

Defendant: Sallie Mae, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Lee Hunt
Case Number: 6:2013cv00500
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge: Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 23, 2014 53 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION and ORDER: Defendant's motion to dismiss 49 is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice. All other pending motions are denied as moot. See formal order. Signed on 2/23/2014 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh) Modified to add "opinion and" to docket entry on 2/25/2014 (ljb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunt v. Sallie Mae, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sallie Mae, Inc.
Represented By: John M. Boylston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Lee Hunt
Represented By: Michael R. Fuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.