COLL v. KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: PETER THOMAS COLL
Defendant: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION and LEAH P. HOLLIS
Case Number: 2:2008cv01815
Filed: April 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other Office
County: Delaware
Presiding Judge: BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COLL v. KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PETER THOMAS COLL
Represented By: ZAKIA E. MOORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEAH P. HOLLIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?