TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS et al v. UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP. et al
Plaintiff: ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN and TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS
Defendant: UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP. and GREG REGALADO
Case Number: 2:2011cv03381
Filed: May 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Delaware
Presiding Judge: BERLE M. SCHILLER
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THE AMOUNT OF $97,235.67 FOR PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS: UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR D/B/A UNIVERSITY ELEVATOR WILL REPORT AND PAY ITS BEN EFIT CONTRIBUTION PAYMENTS WHEN DUE AND WHEN REQUIRED BY THE DOCUMENTS GOVERNING THE PLAINTIFFS PLANS; CONTRIBUTIONS AND INTEREST OWED FOR AUDIT PERIOD OF 1/1/2002 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 8/31/2004 IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,886.66; AUDIT FEES IN THE AM OUNT $2,345.00; INTEREST ACCURED SINCE COMPLETION OF AUDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,810.13; ESTIMATED CONTRIBUTIONS FOR NOVEMBER 2009 TO JULY 2011 IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,041.56; LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,383.57; ATTORNEYS FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,150.00.; COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $618.75. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 11/3/11. 11/4/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(rf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS et al v. UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Represented By: DAVID D. CAPUANO
Represented By: ROBERT P. CURLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS
Represented By: ROBERT P. CURLEY
Represented By: DAVID D. CAPUANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GREG REGALADO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?