TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS et al v. UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP. et al
ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN and TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS |
UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP. and GREG REGALADO |
2:2011cv03381 |
May 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
BERLE M. SCHILLER |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THE AMOUNT OF $97,235.67 FOR PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS: UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR D/B/A UNIVERSITY ELEVATOR WILL REPORT AND PAY ITS BEN EFIT CONTRIBUTION PAYMENTS WHEN DUE AND WHEN REQUIRED BY THE DOCUMENTS GOVERNING THE PLAINTIFFS PLANS; CONTRIBUTIONS AND INTEREST OWED FOR AUDIT PERIOD OF 1/1/2002 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 8/31/2004 IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,886.66; AUDIT FEES IN THE AM OUNT $2,345.00; INTEREST ACCURED SINCE COMPLETION OF AUDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,810.13; ESTIMATED CONTRIBUTIONS FOR NOVEMBER 2009 TO JULY 2011 IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,041.56; LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,383.57; ATTORNEYS FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,150.00.; COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $618.75. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 11/3/11. 11/4/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS et al v. UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN | |
Represented By: | DAVID D. CAPUANO |
Represented By: | ROBERT P. CURLEY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS | |
Represented By: | ROBERT P. CURLEY |
Represented By: | DAVID D. CAPUANO |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNIVERSAL ELEVATOR CORP. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GREG REGALADO | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.