LEWIS et al v. LYCOMING et al
| PAMELA LEWIS, KEITH WHITEHEAD and JOHN JOSEPH WROBLEWSKI |
| LYCOMING, AVCO CORPORATION, TEXTRON, INC., TEXTRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORPORATION, SCHWEIZER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, SCHWEIZER HOLDINGS, INC., SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and CHAMPION AEROSPACE LLC |
| 2:2011cv06475 |
| October 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the U.S. |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| P.I.: Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
251
ORDER THAT MOTION OF DEFT AVCO CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF ITS LYCOMING ENGINES DIVISION, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #210) IS DENIED; & MOTION OF DEFT AVCO CORPORATION TO STRIKE UNTIMELY IMPROPER EXPERT AFFIDAVITS OF MARK SEADER & ARTHUR "LEE" COFFMAN (DOC. #223) IS GRANTED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/29/15.5/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
241
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT AVCO CORPORATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF ENGLISH LAW OF DAMAGES IS DENIED. THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR THE APPLICATION OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW OF DAMAGES IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/22/2014. 12/22/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER THAT MOTION OF DEFTS SCHWEIZER AIRCRAFT CORP., SCHWEIZER HOLDINGS, INC., SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP. & UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (INCORRECTLY DENOMINATED A MOTION TO DISMISS) (DOC. #156) IS DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/17/13. 7/18/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER THAT MOTION OF PLFFS FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORPORATION & PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC IS GRANTED; & PLFFS' CLAIMS AGAINST PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORPORATION & PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/1/13.5/2/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER THAT JOINT MOTION OF DEFTS AVCO CORP., LYCOMING ENGINES, TEXTRON SYSTEMS CORP., TEXTRON, INC., PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORP., SCHWEIZER AIRCRAFT CORP., SCHWEIZER HOLDINGS, INC., SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP., UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., & CHAMPION AEROSPACE LLC TO DISMISS THIS ACTION ON THE GROUND OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS IS DENIED AS TO ALL DEFTS EXCEPT PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC & PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORP.; & MOTION OF DEFTS PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC & PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORP. TO DISMISS THIS ACTION ON THE GROUND OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS IS HELD IN ABEYANCE BASED ON THE AUTOMATIC STAY.SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 1/10/13. 1/10/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER THAT MOTION OF PLFFS PAMELA LEWIS, KEITH WHITEHEAD & JOHN WROBLEWSKI TO REMAND THIS ACTION TO THE PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY IS DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 6/27/12. 6/27/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER THAT MOTION OF PLFFS PAMELA LEWIS, KEITH WHITEHEAD & JOHN WROBLEWSKI TO COLLATERALLY ESTOP AVCO CORPORATION FROM RELITIGATING THE DETERMINATION OF PENNSYLVANIA AS ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/9/12. 5/9/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
