PNC BANK v. KANAAN
Plaintiff: PNC BANK
Defendant: DANIEL KANAAN
Case Number: 2:2011cv07770
Filed: December 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT DANIEL KANAAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND FOR IMPROPER VENUE, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER VENUE, IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 5/21/12. 5/21/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.[FDC]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PNC BANK v. KANAAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PNC BANK
Represented By: LEV KALMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIEL KANAAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?