TELFORD BOROUGH AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
| TELFORD BOROUGH AUTHORITY |
| UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 3, LISA P. JACKSON and SHAWN M. GARVIN |
| 2:2012cv06548 |
| November 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| C. DARNELL JONES |
| Other Statutes: Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
229
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNT FIVE; DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS SIX, SEVEN, EIGHT AND NINE AND THOSE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH P REJUDICE; DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT THIRTEEN AND THAT CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT TO CURE, IF IT CAN DO SO IN GOOD FAITH, THE DEFICIENCIES OUTLINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION AS TO COUNT THIRTEEN.SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 4/27/23. 4/28/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL; E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
209
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY DEADLINE (DOC. NO. 189 ) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. NO. 190 ) IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 11/23/21. 11/23/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL; E-MAILED.(amas, )
|
|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. WITHIN 14 DAYS DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER THAT COMPLIES WITH F.R.C.P.8. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 10/15/21. 10/15/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL;E-MAILED.(amas, )
|
|
Filing
164
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 156 ) IS GRANTED. PARAGRAPHS 12.C, 12.D, 267, 287 THROUGH 290, 368, 387 THROUGH 389, AND 392 THROUGH 398, AND COUNTS IX AND X ARE STRICKEN FROM THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 2/4/21. 2/4/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL; E-MAILED.(amas, )
|
|
Filing
155
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS V, VI, VII, IX, X, AND XVII, AND DENIED AS TO COUNTS VIII AND XV. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 2/6/20. 2/7/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 12 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT WILL BE GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE. THE MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT IV OF THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DENIED WITHOU T PREJUDICE. THE COURT WILL GRANT THE PARTIES LEAVE TO ENGAGE IN LIMITED DISCOVERY ON THE ISSUE OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. DISCOVERY IS DUE BY 1/15/2014. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 11/15/2013. 11/15/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
