RACKLEY v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: SHAKEDA RACKLEY
Defendant: MICHAEL ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2013cv00791
Filed: February 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: LEGROME D. DAVIS
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER REVIEW CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 11/14/13. 11/14/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RACKLEY v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHAKEDA RACKLEY
Represented By: ROBERT J. LUKENS
Represented By: JONATHAN M. STEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?