THE CHOICE IS YOURS, INC. et al v. THE CHOICE IS YOURS et al
| THE CHOICE IS YOURS, INC. and JAMES SMALLWOOD |
| THE CHOICE IS YOURS, SETH WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, WILSON GOODE, PUBLIC/PRIVATE VENTURES, PHILADELPHIA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION, DWIGHT EVANS and OGONTZ AVENUE REVITALIZATION CORP. |
| 2:2014cv01804 |
| March 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| EDWARD G. SMITH |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/31/18. 2/1/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, ECF NO. 191, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO EACH OF PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS, WIT H THE EXCEPTION OF PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER 15 U.S.C. § 1114(A) AND 15 U.S.C. § 1125(A)(1)(A) AND PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT MAYOR WILSON GOODE, ECF NO. 195, IS GR ANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT GOODE AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT GOODE AS A PARTY TO THIS ACTION. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT, PUBLIC/PRIVATE VENTURES, ECF N O. 196, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO EACH OF PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER 15 U.S.C. § 1114(A) AND 15 U.S.C. § 1125(A)(1)(A) AND PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT. A STATUS CONFERENCE TO SET DEADLINES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS ACTION WILL BE SCHEDULED BY THE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/30/16. 9/30/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS THE CHOICE IS YOURS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, AND THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, ECF NO. 96 , IS GRANTED. THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ETC. AS HEREIN. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY SOLICITOR SHELLEY SMITH, AND THE PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT IS GRANTED. THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ETC. AS HEREIN. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 154 , IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS AND THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIAS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND SUR-REPLY IN FURTHER OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 172 , IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLA INTIFF SHALL HAVE FOURTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/21/15. 9/23/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (mas, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
