BYNUM v. TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
| BRANDON BYNUM |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, COOPER and JOHN DOE NUMBERS 1 THROUGH TEN |
| 2:2014cv04548 |
| July 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| STEWART DALZELL |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 18 ), IS GRANTED, ETC. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 9 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS ' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SANCTIONC (DOC. NO. 19 ), IS GRANTED, ETC. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. NO. 8 ), IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS SHALL ANSWER THE COMPLAINT BY 8/5/2015. THE TWO ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTIONS ARE CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE C.A. NO. 14-4548 STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 7/23/2015. 7/24/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4 ), IS GRANTED IN PART, AS OUTLINED HEREIN. DEFENDANTS SHALL ANSWER THE COMPLAINT BY 12/2/2014. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 11/18/2014. 11/19/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
