LUO v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
Plaintiff: JENN-CHING LUO
Defendant: OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, GEOFFREY BALL and CATHY A. SKIDMORE
Case Number: 2:2014cv06354
Filed: November 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 144 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE RENEWED MOTION OF DEFENDANT GEOFFREY BALL TO DISMISS CLAIMS 1,2,3,5,6,7, AND 8, DATED 11/14/23 124 IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/19/23. 12/19/23 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF JENN-CHING LUO TO RECONSIDER THE COURTS OCTOBER 30, 2023 ORDER (DOC. # 123) IS GRANTED AS TO CLAIMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, 13, AND 16 IN LUO IV, CIV. A. NO. 16-6568; 2 (2) CLAIMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 16 IN LUO IV, CIV. A. NO. 16-6568, ARE DISMISSED; AND (3) THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS OTHERWISE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/7/23. 12/8/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS OF PLAINTIFF JENN-CHING LUO FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT IN LUO I, CIV. A. NO. 14-6354 (DOC. # 115 ), LUO IV, CIV. A. NO. 16-6568 (DOC. # 35), AND LUO V, CIV. A. NO. 17-1508 (DOC. # 29), DATED OCTOBER 5, 2023, ARE DENIED; AS OUTLINED HEREREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 10/30/23. 10/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
November 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER THAT LUO'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION (NO. 14-6454, DKT. NO. 49; NO. 15-2952, DKT. NO. 33; NO. 15-4248, DKT. NO. 22) ARE DENIED. LUO'S MOTION TO STAY THE COMPLAINT OF THE CASE 15-4248 AND OPEN THE CASE (NO. 14-6354, DKT. NO. 50 & NO. 14-6354, DKT. NO. 23) IS DENIED. LUO SHALL HAVE UNTIL 12/23/2016, TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT. FAILURE TO FILE THIS DOCUMENT BY THAT DATE SHALL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN MY 10/31/2016 AMENDED ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 11/28/16. 11/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, ) Modified on 11/29/2016 (ti, ).
October 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF JENN-CHIN LUO'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN PART. DEFEDANT SKIDMORE'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND A LL CLAIMS AGAINST SKIDMORE ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT MONTAYNE'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT KOLBAY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS BALL AND OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED. UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT, COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN CIVIL ACTION NO. 15 -2952, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. LUO'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS DENIED. THE DISTRICT'S MOTION TO DISMISS LUO'S COUNTERCLAIM IS GRANTED AND THE COUNTERCLAIM IS DISMISSED WIT H PREJUDICE. THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND THE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-4248, IT IS OR DERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN PART. DEFENDANT MONTAYNE'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST MONTAYNE ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE MOTION TO DISMISS BY THE DISTRICT, BALL AND SCHNEIDER I S GRANTED IN PART. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5248 SHALL BE MARKED CLOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT LUO SHALL HAVE THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-6354 AND 15-2952 SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED. THE CLERK SHALL DOCKET ALL FILINGS ON THESE CONSOLIDATED MATTERS UNDER CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 14-6354. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/27/16. 10/27/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUO v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JENN-CHING LUO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEOFFREY BALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CATHY A. SKIDMORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?