ENSLIN v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY et al
| SHANE K. ENSLIN |
| THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC., COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, INC., KEYSTONE COCA-COLA AND BOTTLING AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING CORPORATION, THOMAS WILLIAM ROGERS, III, DOE DEFENDANTS 1-50, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-50 and XYZ PARTNERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS |
| 2:2014cv06476 |
| November 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 2721 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 168 , IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC., KEYSTONE COCA-COLA AND BOTTLING AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., K EYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., AND KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING CORPORATIONS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 170 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, AS FOLLOWS: (A) THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IS DENIED. (B) THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, ECF NO. 125 , IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 127 , IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS EXPERT REPORT, ECF NO. 149 , IS DENIED AS MOOT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC., KEYSTONE COCA-COLA AND BOTTLING AND DISTRIBUT ION CORPORATION, KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., AND KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING CORPORATION, AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. DOE DEFENDANTS 1-50, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-50, AND XYZ PARTNERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS ARE DI SMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TERMINATE THESE PARTIES. NO LATER THAN APRIL 17, 2017, PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE A STATUS REPORT CONCERNING THE EFFECT OF THIS ORDER ON HIS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT THOMAS WILLIAM ROGERS, III, WHO IS CURRENTLY IN DEFAULT. SEE ECF NO. 37 . SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/31/17. 3/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS COCA-COLA COMPANY, COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC., KEYSTONE COCA-COLA AND BOTTLING AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., AND KEYSTONE COCA-COLA BOTTLING CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DIS MISS, ECF NO. 10, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: COUNTS ONE, TWO, THREE, SIX, EIGHT, AND NINE ARE DISMISSED. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/29/15. 9/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.(er, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
