JACOBS v. HALPER et al
MICHAEL JACOBS |
SHARON HALPER, BARRY HALPER, INC., SOTHEBY'S, INC., SOTHEBY PARKE BERNET, INC., SOTHEBY'S HOLDINGS, SOTHEBY'S, GREY FLANNEL AUCTIONS, INC. and GREY FLANNEL COLLECTIBLES, INC. |
2:2014cv06515 |
November 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Montgomery |
EDMUND V. LUDWIG |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/25/16. 7/26/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE GREY FLANNEL DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED; ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE GREY FLANNEL DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE SOTHEBY'S DEFENDANTS' AND THE HALPER DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS ARE GRANTED IN PAR T AND DENIED IN PART; THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION CLAIM (COUNT I) ARE DENIED; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (COUNT II) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR VIOLATIONS OF NEW YORK GENERAL BUSINESS CODE SECTION 349 (COUNT III) ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR VIOLATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA'S UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW, 72 PA. CONS. STAT. SECTION 201-1 ET SEQ (COUNT IV) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT (COUNT V) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/22/15. 7/22/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.