MCCLOUD v. OVERMYER et al
Petitioner: MUSTAFA MCCLOUD
Respondent: M.D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2014cv06948
Filed: December 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: LYNNE A. SITARSKI
Presiding Judge: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE WHILE PETITIONER LITIGATES HIS PCRA PETITION IN THE STATE COURTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS CASE IN SUSPENSE. PETITIONER SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE STATE PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/31/22. 6/1/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
June 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; RESPONDENTS MOTION TO STAY PENDING HABEAS CORPUS ACTION (DOC. NO. 30) IS GRANTED; THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE WHILE PETITIONER LITIGATES HIS PCRA PETITION IN THE STATE COURTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/4/18. 6/5/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd, )
March 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE (DOC. NO. 2) IS GRANTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE WHILE PETITIONER LITIGATES HIS PCRA PETITI ON IN THE STATE COURT; PETITIONER SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE CONCLUSION OF PETITIONER'S STATE PROCEEDINGS AND INFORM THE COURT OF THE STATUS OF PETITIONER'S HABEAS PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/26/15. 3/26/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCCLOUD v. OVERMYER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MUSTAFA MCCLOUD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M.D. OVERMYER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?