COOK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN et al v. PANZARELLA
| COOK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, COOK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COOK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN TRUST and MICHAEL L. FINNEGAN |
| THOMAS A. PANZARELLA |
| 2:2015cv01028 |
| February 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| L. FELIPE RESTREPO |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS (DOC. NO. 148 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND THE COOK PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO PAY ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $247,364.37 TO THOMAS A. PANZARELLA IN FURTHERANCE OF THE FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE DECISION AND ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT IN THESE MATTERS DATED 12/17/2018. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 5/2/2019. 5/3/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
132
DECISION ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. ALL OF THE PAYMENTS ORDERED TO BE MADE BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES IN THIS ACTION SHALL BE PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ENTRY DATE OF THIS DECISION AND ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 12/17/2018. 12/18/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
