ANDRESS et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
KIMBERLY ANDRESS and GEORGE ANDRESS |
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
2:2015cv01779 |
April 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER THAT NATIONSTAR'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. COUNTS II, III, AND V OF PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER IF WARRANTED BY THE FACTS AND APPLICABLE LAW. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 1/6/2016. 1/7/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 27 ORDER THAT PART OF BOA'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS OUTLINED HEREIN IS GRANTED. COUNTS I-III AND V-VI OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMSISED WITH PREJUDICE. PARTS OF BOA'S MOTION TO DISMISS WHICH SEEKS DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS UNDER THE REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES ACT IS GRNATED. COUNT IV OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFFS RIGHT TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER IF WARRANTED BY THE FACTS AND APPLICABLE LAW. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 9/30/2015. 10/1/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.