SCHLICHTING v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD et al
| KEITH S. SCHLICHTING |
| NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD, GARY SIPES, ROBERT FRANK, GEORGE GRESS and JEFF BERGER |
| 5:2015cv02851 |
| May 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lehigh |
| EDWARD G. SMITH |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1) IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; 2. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E) (2)(B)(II); 3. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE PLAINTIFF WITH A COPY OF THE FORM CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION THAT IS AVAILABLE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE; 4. THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. IF THE PLAINTIFF FAILS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE COURT MAY DISMISS HIS CASE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO HIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 7/7/15. 7/7/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, UNREPS.(er, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
