Faustov v. Mroz

Plaintiff: Yuriy Faustov
Defendant: Jennifer Mroz
Case Number: 1:2013cv01133
Filed: April 29, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Pike
Referring Judge: SF
Presiding Judge: John E. Jones
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 22, 2015 34 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) (eo)
May 22, 2015 35 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. Plaintiffs action is deemed abandoned and is DISMISSED in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (eo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faustov v. Mroz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yuriy Faustov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Mroz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.