Rinaldi v. Zickfoose

Petitioner: Michael Rinaldi
Respondent: Zickfoose
Case Number: 1:2013cv01976
Filed: July 22, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Union
Referring Judge: AM
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H. Rambo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 20, 2015 19 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 and Mtn for Bail Pending Habeas Relief 9 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 04/20/15. (ma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rinaldi v. Zickfoose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Rinaldi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Zickfoose
Represented By: John C. Gurganus, Jr.
Represented By: Mark Morrison(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.