Ross v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Sandra Ann Ross
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2014cv00990
Filed: May 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Karoline Mehalchick
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H. Rambo
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 17 ; The decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court shall close the file..Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 04/08/15. (ma)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ross v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Ann Ross
Represented By: F. Michael Friedman
Represented By: Matthew J Vassallo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?