Patrick v. Werner Enterprises
Plaintiff: Leonard L. Patrick
Defendant: Werner Enterprises
Case Number: 1:2015cv00108
Filed: January 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: Susan E. Schwab
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of MJ Schwab and GRANTS the 95 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Deft Werner Enterprises. The Clerk is directed to enter jgm and CLOSE the case. 99 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 2/16/18. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (sc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patrick v. Werner Enterprises
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonard L. Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Werner Enterprises
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?