RUHEL et al v. S.N.M. ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff: Shirley T. Ruhel and Edward H. Ruehl
Defendant: S.N.M. Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv00168
Filed: January 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: sanctions litigation relating to the Plaintiffs expert witness, Michael Panish. In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Panish shall pay the following as sanctions in this case to the Plaintiffs counsel: 1. $20,953.00 in attorneys fees. 2. $1,317.30 in costs. TOTAL: $22.270.30. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 20, 2018. (kjn)
November 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 64 motion filed by the defendant and joined in by the plaintiff to sanction a non-party plaintiffs expert witness, Michael Panish. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on November 28, 2017. (kjn)
April 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Magistrate Judge Carlsons Report and Recommendation 51 , is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant S.N.M.s motion 44 for partial summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. S.N.M.s motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiffs wrongful death claim; b. S.N.M.s motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims for punitive damages; and 3. This matter is recommitted back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further pretrial proceedings. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 4/28/17. (rw)
March 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM ORDER - IT IS ORDERED THAT the plaintiffs request for a protective order to preclude the video recording of Mr. Panishs deposition is DENIED. The defendant shall be permitted to record Mr. Panishs deposition by video and stenographic means. SEE MEMO & ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 17, 2017. (kjn)
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 11 Pltfs' claim for punitive damages is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 5/18/15. (sc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RUHEL et al v. S.N.M. ENTERPRISES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shirley T. Ruhel
Represented By: Tyler J Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward H. Ruehl
Represented By: Tyler J Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S.N.M. Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Todd B. Narvol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?