Hanczyc v. Valley Distributing and Storage Company, Inc. et al
| Stanley J. Hanczyc, Jr. |
| Valley Distributing and Storage Company, Inc., Conrad Kotlowski and Carol Keup |
| 3:2010cv02397 |
| November 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| Unassigned2 |
| Welfare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER re 70 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) is DENIED.(2)Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to liability on his Fair Labor Standards Act (Count VI) and Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (Count VII) claims is GRANTED, but the issue of damages is reserved for trial. Plaintiffs motion is DENIED in all other respects.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/7/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress claims is GRANTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss Palintiff's PHRA claim is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/9/11 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
