Biniek et al v. T.J Maxx/The T.J. Maxx Companies, Inc.
Edward Biniek and Marla Biniek |
T.J Maxx/The T.J. Maxx Companies, Inc. and Jofran, Inc. |
T.J Maxx/The T.J. Maxx Companies, Inc. and Jofran, Inc. |
Jofran, Inc. and T.J Maxx/The T.J. Maxx Companies, Inc. |
3:2014cv01154 |
June 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Luzerne |
Malachy E Mannion |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1.Marmaxxs motions in limine, (Docs. 30, 32), are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2.Marmaxxs motion in limine, (Doc. 34), is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY.3.Jofrans motion in limine, (Doc. 36), to pre clude lay opinion testimony is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.4.Plaintiffs motion in limine, (Doc. 38), is DENIED, IN PART, WITHOUT PREJUDICE and, DENIED regarding Fergusons opinions that the chair was properly designed and assembled.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/30/15. (bs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.