Dodson et al v. Beijing Capital Tire Company, Ltd. et al
Vincent Dodson and Rosalin Davis-Dodson |
Beijing Capital Tire Company, Ltd. and World Wide Distribution, Inc. |
3:2014cv01358 |
July 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Lackawanna |
Malachy E Mannion |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 38 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Expert Testimony of Allan J. Kam filed by World Wide Distribution, Inc., 40 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Expert Testimony of Willia m J. Woehrle filed by World Wide Distribution, Inc., 43 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Raising the Alleged Negligence or Recklessness of Plaintiff as a Defense to Liability or Causation filed by Vincent Dodson, 45 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Evidence, Testimony or Argument Concerning Alleged Negligence of Plaintiff's Employer or Third Party in Causing the Subject Accident filed by Vincent Dodson, 47 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Test imony of Defendants' Expert, Alfred Cipriani filed by Vincent Dodson, 49 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Evidence, Testimony or Argument Regarding Alleged Lack of Prior Similar Accidents filed by Vincent Dodson Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 9/27/2017. (cw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.