Sabo v. REO Property Management, LLC

Sabo v. REO Property Management, LLC

Plaintiff:	Elizabeth Sabo
Defendant:	REO Property Management, LLC
Case Number:	3:2015cv00131
Filed:	January 20, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Carbon
Presiding Judge:	Malachy E Mannion
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 8, 2015	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re: Plaintiff's Doc. 33 motion to amend complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/8/15. (ms)
April 30, 2015	Filing 23 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)DENYING Doc. 4 Motion to Dismiss. After reviewing the motion to dismiss (Doc. 4) filed by the defendant and after review of the submissions of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:1 .The motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED;2.The motion requesting an order directing the plaintiff to file an amended complaint is hereby DENIED;3.The defendants motion seeking a sixty (60) day extension of time to file an answer to the complaint is hereby DENIED.4.The defendant shall file its answer within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order pursuant to F.R.Civ.P 12(a)(4)(A).Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/30/15. (ms)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 8, 2015

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re: Plaintiff's Doc. 33 motion to amend complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/8/15. (ms)

April 30, 2015

Filing 23 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)DENYING Doc. 4 Motion to Dismiss. After reviewing the motion to dismiss (Doc. 4) filed by the defendant and after review of the submissions of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:1 .The motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED;2.The motion requesting an order directing the plaintiff to file an amended complaint is hereby DENIED;3.The defendants motion seeking a sixty (60) day extension of time to file an answer to the complaint is hereby DENIED.4.The defendant shall file its answer within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order pursuant to F.R.Civ.P 12(a)(4)(A).Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/30/15. (ms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sabo v. REO Property Management, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Sabo
Represented By:	Mark J. Gottesfeld
Represented By:	R. Andrew Santillo
Represented By:	Peter D. Winebrake
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: REO Property Management, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?