M.J. v. Luzerne County et al
M.J. |
Luzerne County, Luzerne County Children and Youth Services, Jesse Goshert, Maryann Rambus, Concern, Inc. and Kathy Ryan |
3:2017cv01443 |
August 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Luzerne |
A. Richard Caputo |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 35) filed by Defendants Luzerne County, Luzerne County Children and Youth Services, Jesse Goshert, and Maryann Rambus is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (A) Plaintiffs vicarious liability claim against the County and LCCYS inCount Four of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.(B) County Defendants motion is DENIED in all other respects.(2) The Motion for Partial Dismissal (Doc. 37) filed by Concern-ProfessionalServices for Children, Youth, and Families, Lisa Ross, and Kathy Sheridan isGRANTED in part and DENIED in part.(A) Plaintiffs vicarious liability claim against Concern for Kathy Ryansactions in Count Four of the Amended Complai nt is DISMISSED with prejudice.(B) Concern Defendants motion is DENIED in all other respects.(3) Defendant Kathy Ryans Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 38) is DENIED.(4) Defendants shall file Answers to the Amended Complaint within twenty-one days from the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/25/18. (dw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.