Hill v. Jordan

Petitioner: Demetrius Hill
Respondent: Jordan
Case Number: 4:2013cv01087
Filed: April 25, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Adams
Referring Judge: JV
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 13, 2014 19 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/13/14. (km)
November 13, 2014 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: In accordance with the MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry no. 19, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/13/14. (km)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Demetrius Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.