Weidow v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Tracey L. Weidow
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Case Number: 4:2015cv00765
Filed: April 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Luzerne
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Saporito
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry); this appeal is denied, Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against the plaintiff; the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; clerk shall close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 10/7/16. (lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weidow v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracey L. Weidow
Represented By: John A. Loftus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?