Hockenberry vs. Colvin
Plaintiff: Lori Hockenberry
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2015cv00793
Filed: April 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Cumberland
Presiding Judge: GS
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: adopting 23 Report and Recommendation; the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against the plaintiff; clerk directed to close the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 12/14/16. (lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hockenberry vs. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Hockenberry
Represented By: Stephen J. Hogg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?