FLUELLEN v. MEEKS

Petitioner: SHERMAN CRAYTON FLUELLEN
Respondent: BOBBY L. MEEKS
Case Number: 1:2014cv00091
Filed: March 17, 2014
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Erie Office
County: McKean
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 8, 2015 8 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is further ORDERED that 7 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 4/8/15. (bdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FLUELLEN v. MEEKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SHERMAN CRAYTON FLUELLEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BOBBY L. MEEKS
Represented By: Amie S. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.