MINOR-JONES v. REED ELSEVIER, INC et al
| CYNTHIA M. MINOR-JONES |
| REED ELSEVIER, INC and LEXISNEXIS MEDICAL REVIEW SERVICES |
| 2:2011cv01488 |
| November 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Mark R. Hornak |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CYNTHIA M. MINOR-JONES. (Elzer, Christine) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine T. Elzer on behalf of CYNTHIA M. MINOR-JONES. (Elzer, Christine) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re 1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. This message is for informational purposes only. Disclosure Statement due by 11/30/2011. (ksa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD 11-022107 Copies attached: Complaint, Declaration of Cathy Devine and Lexis Nexis Verdict Search (Filing fee $350, receipt number 0315-2165972), filed by LEXISNEXIS MEDICAL REVIEW SERVICES, REED ELSEVIER, INC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A State Court Complaint, # 3 Exhibit B Declaration of Cathy Devine, # 4 Exhibit C Lexis Nexis Verdict Search) (ksa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
