U.S. AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION v. US AIRWAYS, INC

Plaintiff: U.S. AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant: US AIRWAYS, INC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00627
Filed: May 3, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joy Flowers Conti
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45:151 Railway Labor Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2013 36 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: Motion to Dismiss 17 . Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 09/30/2013. (ten)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S. AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION v. US AIRWAYS, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S. AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Joseph J. Pass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US AIRWAYS, INC
Represented By: Jeffrey Ivan Pasek
Represented By: Mark W. Robertson
Represented By: Robert A. Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.