STERRETT v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al
| RICHARD A. STERRETT |
| GIANT EAGLE, INC., OK GROCERY COMPANY, INC. and GENERAL WAREHOUSEMEN & EMPLOYEES, LOCAL UNION NO. 636 |
| 2:2014cv00235 |
| February 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER adopting the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 111 as the opinion of this Court; that the Motion for Summary Judgment 93 , is granted and the Clerk is to mark the case closed; that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Fed eral Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/6/16. (jg)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Magistrate Judge Kelly's ruling regarding Plaintiff's tax returns was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 76 ) are OVERRULED, and Judge Kelly's ruling is AFFI RMED. Furthermore, Plaintiff's stated concerns regarding his wife's privacy interests easily may be addressed through redaction or protective order. The Court is confident that counsel can resolve this issue without further judicial intervention. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/7/15. (dcd)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying 59 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 4/13/15. (dcd)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Defendants' Motions (Docs. 46 & 48 ) to dismiss are GRANTED; Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 54 ) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court; and this case may proceed against the OK Grocery Defendants, only, under Counts III and IV of the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/25/15. (dcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
