FABRIZIANI et al v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. et al
COLLEEN FABRIZIANI and ROBERT G. FABRIZIANI |
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C., INC. and PACESETTER, INC. |
2:2014cv00814 |
June 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Fayette |
Cathy Bissoon |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER. The parties' Joint Motion (Doc. 18 ) to stay is GRANTED, and this case hereby is STAYED. The Court and parties expect the duration of the stay to be 90 days. For the duration of the stay, this case is and shall remain administratively closed. Administrative closings comprise a familiar way in which courts remove cases from their active files without final adjudication. Administrative closure is a docket control device used by the Court for statistical purposes, and it does not p rejudice the rights of the parties in any manner. Within 30 days after the expiration of the 90-day stay period, if the case has not resolved, Plaintiff shall file a motion to lift the stay and restore the case to the Court's active docket. If the case does resolve, the parties promptly shall notify Chambers by telephone (412.208.7460) and be prepared to file, within a reasonable time, a stipulation of dismissal. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/25/14. (dcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.