HEINZL v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION

HEINZL v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	SARAH HEINZL
Defendant:	STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Case Number:	2:2014cv01316
Filed:	September 25, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Allegheny
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Mitchell
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2015	Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 50 Motion for Reconsideration OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 30(B)(6) NOTICE OF DEPOSITION DIRECTED TO STARBUCKS CORPORATION filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION, denying 52 Motion for Reconsideration OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION, denying 45 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Dismissing Defendant's Motion for Protective Order fil ed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION, denying 51 MOTION for Reconsideration OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 5/18/2015. (spc)
March 9, 2015	Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 13 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 3/9/2015. (spc)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2015

Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 50 Motion for Reconsideration OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 30(B)(6) NOTICE OF DEPOSITION DIRECTED TO STARBUCKS CORPORATION filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION, denying 52 Motion for Reconsideration OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION, denying 45 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Dismissing Defendant's Motion for Protective Order fil ed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION, denying 51 MOTION for Reconsideration OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 5/18/2015. (spc)

March 9, 2015

Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 13 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 3/9/2015. (spc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HEINZL v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: SARAH HEINZL
Represented By:	Benjamin J. Sweet
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Represented By:	Anthony W. Hinkle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?