LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION

LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC
Defendant:	TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Case Number:	2:2014cv01526
Filed:	November 6, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Allegheny
Presiding Judge:	Cathy Bissoon
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2017	Filing 172 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum filed herewith, Defendants Headway Technologies, Inc., SAE Magnetics H.K. Ltd. and TDK Corporation's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 103 and 127 ) are GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims against Defendants Headway Technologies, Inc., SAE Magnetics H.K. Ltd. and TDK Corporation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/1/17. (jwr)
November 4, 2015	Filing 56 ORDER. The parties' Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines (Doc. 55 ) is GRANTED as follows: This case hereby is STAYED pending ongoing mediation efforts. For the duration of the stay, this case is and shall remain ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. As and w hen appropriate, any party may restore this action to the Court's active calendar upon application or by motion. The parties' pending motions (Docs. 45 , 48 ) are DENIED without prejudice to refiling, if appropriate, should the case be reopened. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/4/15. (jwr)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2017

Filing 172 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum filed herewith, Defendants Headway Technologies, Inc., SAE Magnetics H.K. Ltd. and TDK Corporation's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 103 and 127 ) are GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims against Defendants Headway Technologies, Inc., SAE Magnetics H.K. Ltd. and TDK Corporation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/1/17. (jwr)

November 4, 2015

Filing 56 ORDER. The parties' Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines (Doc. 55 ) is GRANTED as follows: This case hereby is STAYED pending ongoing mediation efforts. For the duration of the stay, this case is and shall remain ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. As and w hen appropriate, any party may restore this action to the Court's active calendar upon application or by motion. The parties' pending motions (Docs. 45 , 48 ) are DENIED without prejudice to refiling, if appropriate, should the case be reopened. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/4/15. (jwr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC
Represented By:	Christian D. Ehret
Represented By:	John W. McIlvaine, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?