HELVY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
| RUBY HELVY |
| ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES |
| 2:2014cv01686 |
| December 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Terrence F. McVerry |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks to dismiss any claims based on Plaintiffs October 24, 2014, suspension; GRANTED insofar as the March 23 , 2014, reprimand is not individually actionable; and GRANTED insofar as it seeks to dismiss Plaintiffs request for punitive damages. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services is DISMISSED as a Defendant since i t is not a separate legal entitity. Defendant shall file an answer to Plaintiffs amended complaint on or before March 3, 2015. The parties shall confer as necessary and shall file with the Court the Stipulation Selecting ADR Process and the Rule 26(f) Report on or before March 10, 2015. The Initial Case Management Conference is hereby SCHEDULED on March 17, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6C. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 2/17/2015. (rjw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
