JENKINS v. BERRIER et al
| JAMILL JENKINS |
| SUSAN BERRIER and BRIAN V. COLEMAN |
| 2:2015cv00277 |
| February 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Fayette |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 50 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for 34 Summary Judgment submitted on behalf of Defendants is GRANTED, and the Clerk is to mark the case closed. IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/14/2016. (smc)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 30 Motion for Appointment of Medical Personnel Assistance for the reasons set forth more fully in the Memorandum Order itself. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/4/15. [A copy of this Memorandum Order was mailed to Plaintiff on this date at his address of record]. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
