BARNES v. WARTZ et al
Plaintiff: TONY S. BARNES
Defendant: PAM WARTZ, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., MARC MASSUCI and TERRENCE E. TOMASSETI
Case Number: 3:2015cv00134
Filed: May 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Johnstown Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Kim R. Gibson
Presiding Judge: Maureen P. Kelly
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 67 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 84 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is further Ordered that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appe llate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed.R.App.P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days, and as more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 11/28/2016. (dlg)
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 45 , is granted. However, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the dismissal is without prejudice as to Counts II, IV, VI and VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that Plaintiff is permitted to file, with in twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, an Amended Complaint on these counts to specifically address the deficiencies identified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/26/2016. (dlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARNES v. WARTZ et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TONY S. BARNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAM WARTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARC MASSUCI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERRENCE E. TOMASSETI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?