MOLINELLI-FREYTES et al

Plaintiff: JOSE MOLINELLI-FREYTES and LILLIAN BIRD-CANALS
Case Number: 3:2009cv01655
Filed: July 13, 2009
Court: Puerto Rico District Court
Office: San Juan Office
County: Adjuntas
Presiding Judge: Daniel R. Dominguez
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2012 445 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 409 for 336 Motion for Summary Judgment; 339 Motion for Summary Judgment; and 341 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 9/30/2012.(om) Modified on 10/2/2012 correcting filing date (np).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MOLINELLI-FREYTES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSE MOLINELLI-FREYTES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LILLIAN BIRD-CANALS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.