Ramos-Estremera v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Migdalia Ramos-Estremera
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2009cv01817
Filed: August 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: San Juan Office
County: Camuy
Presiding Judge: Gustavo A. Gelpi
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER affirming the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff disability benefits. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 2/5/10.(CSL) Modified on 2/8/2010 as title (er).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramos-Estremera v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Migdalia Ramos-Estremera
Represented By: Melba N. Rivera-Camacho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?