Subrun v. United States of America
Petuel Subrun |
United States of America |
3:2010cv01161 |
February 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
Adjuntas |
Jaime Pieras, Jr |
Federal Employer's Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTING Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jaime Pieras, Jr. on 9/27/2010. (mld) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Subrun v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Petuel Subrun | |
Represented By: | Richard Schell-Asad |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.