Cerezo-Martin v. Ferrovial Agroman S.A.
Plaintiff: Tomas Cerezo-Martin
Defendant: Ferrovial Agroman S.A.
Case Number: 3:2015cv01350
Filed: April 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: San Juan Office
County: Gurabo
Presiding Judge: Jose A. Fuste
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER re 10 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART defendant's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 10/04/2016. (brc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cerezo-Martin v. Ferrovial Agroman S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tomas Cerezo-Martin
Represented By: Christian J. Francis-Martinez
Represented By: Jose J. Gueits-Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ferrovial Agroman S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?