Medoff v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Richard Medoff
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation, Thomas M. Ryan, David Rickard and Howard McClure
Case Number: 1:2009cv00554
Filed: November 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Office: Providence Office
County: Providence
Presiding Judge: David L. Martin
Presiding Judge: William E Smith
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 153 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER terminating 120 Motion for Settlement; granting 128 Motion for Settlement/Final Approval of the Settlement and Plan Allocation; granting 130 Motion for Attorney Fees. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante, District of NH on 2/17/16. (Jackson, Ryan)
November 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER CERTIFYING A CLASS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE re: 120 MOTION for Settlement Notice of Co-Lead Plaintiffs Assented to Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante, District of NH on 11/9/2015. (Jackson, Ryan)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: 34 Motion to Dismiss, filed by David Rickard, Thomas M. Ryan, CVS Caremark Corporation, Howard McClure. The defendants motion to dismiss is denied, with further narrowing of the plaintiffs claims to await a later stage of the litigation. So Ordered by Joseph N Laplante on 12/30/2013. (Urizandi, Nisshy)
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 PROCEDURAL ORDER re: 34 MOTION to Dismiss filed by David Rickard, Thomas M. Ryan, CVS Caremark Corporation, Howard McClure. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante, District of NH on 3/22/11. (Jackson, Ryan)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medoff v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Medoff
Represented By: Barry J. Kusinitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas M. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Rickard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard McClure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?