Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 3 v. Union Stone, Inc. et al
Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 3 |
Nuzzo Campion Stone Enterprises, Inc. and Union Stone, Inc. |
1:2013cv00138 |
March 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Lincoln D. Almond |
Mary M. Lisi |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Employee Pension Plan |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Defendant Union Stone's 15 Motion to Dismiss (converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment); and, granting Plaintiff Local 3's 18 Motion to Amend the Complaint in order to add a claim against David Corriveault. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 10/17/2013. (Duhamel, John) |
Filing 21 ORDER re 15 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Union Stone, Inc: The parties are herewith put on notice that the Court will treat the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. -- The parties are instructed to submit all materials, if any, which they consider pertinent to the motion, on or before OCTOBER 7, 2013. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 9/20/2013. (Duhamel, John) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 3 Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 5/14/2013. (Duhamel, John) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.