Provident Bank, The v. Ferrell

Plaintiff: Provident Bank, The
Defendant: Jerry W Ferrell
Case Number: 0:2011cv01760
Filed: July 21, 2011
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Rock Hill Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 1, 2011 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 9 Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment, awarding default Judgment in favor of Provident Bank and against Jerry W. Ferrel in the sum certain amount of $131,509.44. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 09/01/2011.(bshr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Provident Bank, The v. Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Provident Bank, The
Represented By: Michael J Bogle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry W Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.